Skip to main content

Post Office data accounts: What if?

 August 24, 2023

It shouldn't be hard, yet, to digitize the Post Office.  By so doing it would mean to bring them into the discourse of the 21st century.  If the Post Office opened up digital data storage accounts for every resident and citizen of the United States of America that would greatly go to more accessibility to information for the general public.  These accounts could host important files and documents under encrypted security -- for the convenience, expedience, and perfect felicity of the public.  

There are several ways to do this and I trust that the best one can be found.  Certainly there exist the security protocols to make a decent start at a program like this which would be a low cost and efficient addition to the Post Office structure.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situationalism v. dispositionism

  We must attain, interrogate, critique, and transform measures of attitude, perception, and belief, revealing conclusions about the nature of what someone knows. So I want to show you a modified Venn diagram — modified by me, so please be patient — and which describes two aspects of social psychology that influence policy, behavior, and belief through structures of law and the way we approach thinking about questions involving human disputes within institutional structures; so you can see that, roughly dividing this category of looking at people and their relationship to larger systems and how those systems in turn see people into two camps, you have situationalism, which means people‘s social context shapes choices, and you have dispositionism which basically pre-judges people on social characteristics leading to the notion that someone can be at fault for who they are. Of course, there’s some fuzzy areas in the middle. For instance, you can say that context and sense of self sha...

Answering some nagging philosophical questions

Structurally sound assumptions may be made by simply denying all assumptions that may be made until they prove themselves otherwise.   This is why science is still so relevant because science is the purest natural expression of logic.   However, such an important distinction and framing needs the further question: for what does logic serve human beings?   The straightest answer I can give you is, while some will claim that a sound assumption denies its opposite, the truth is that a denial of the truth denies itself, and that’s why the truth is true, since Socrates.   The establishment of truth has been difficult since then.   Do you follow what I’m saying?   Logically speaking, logic is truth, but truth is not logic.   So we enter a dialectic.   The distinction but not difference between facts and actualities is the difference in making sense of it here.   The truth is a fact that became an actuality.  

We wanted to you see this -- my copy of the Standard

To: Supreme Court, USA Care of: Sonia Sotomayor, A.J.  Attn: Elena Kagan, A.J., Ketanji Brown Jackson, A.J. LIMITED. From: .|Î|.  TrīangłeLāw.  .|Î|.   |. •        :::THE STANDARD::                — all the time; everything; everywhere.. Î.               ;::::::::*::::::================; ,;::*::::*::::*:===============;    the  ;:::::*::::*::::===============;  ;=======================;         Standard:  ;========the Standard..=====;  ;=======================;       å                 ;======================; newšmagåźîné  ı                               of commentary and analysis  ı         ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...