Answering some nagging philosophical questions

Structurally sound assumptions may be made by simply denying all assumptions that may be made until they prove themselves otherwise. This is why science is still so relevant because science is the purest natural expression of logic. However, such an important distinction and framing needs the further question: for what does logic serve human beings? The straightest answer I can give you is, while some will claim that a sound assumption denies its opposite, the truth is that a denial of the truth denies itself, and that’s why the truth is true, since Socrates. The establishment of truth has been difficult since then. Do you follow what I’m saying? Logically speaking, logic is truth, but truth is not logic. So we enter a dialectic. The distinction but not difference between facts and actualities is the difference in making sense of it here. The truth is a fact that became an actuality.

Comments

Above Overreaching Capitalism, Underappreciated Syndicalist Actualities

Notes on the Man in Black No matter, though, how good things go, they’ve always got to wait. —Lewis Capaldi, Old Navy Blue More than ever, I try these days to trace the arc of moral justice without the input of state associations. The moral decrepitude of the party in charge of most of the government at this point has made that imperative. Of course, there are many other paths being operationalized and billed as alternatives. Yes, we have emerged from a problematic and uninspiring 20th century and many who should be by classic logical supposition, able to explain the immediate past to Americans, are simply unable to do so without facts of which they have no knowledge. Because of this and in fact due to ignorance, they have been unable to break the propaganda curse and reveal the scoundrels’ playbook, which though exemplified by Project 2025 represents a broader anti-patriotic desire to sell off the country to the highest bidder. This ...

à la omnia: an exploration of rhythm, time, and personhood

In the month of July, — The Honeybee from Religious Symbolism to Enlightenment Why was Deity associated with the honeybee? There’s a sort of speculative fiction book that explores the origin of religion in ancient Mesopotamia through a sort of meta-narrative of science fiction, and on the surface level, I’m drawing from that novel. ( Fall , Neal Stephenson.) But storyline aside, there’s an interesting take there on the origin of the connection between Deity and the honeybee, showing how practices of worship situated around agricultural rites eventually foregrounded the importance of the honeybee, and that insect and its hive became a symbol of deity, perhaps brought about through the actions of devotees to a specific Canaanite religious sect, but also through a generalized familiarity among the population of the ancient Near East with the honeybee’s pollination abilities and the honey it produced, which could have strengthened its position as a symbol, even among those who...

Context We are not just seeing the emergence of new technologies in this age of humanity but also the emergence of new ideas. Not only the ability to quickly reproduce works of art and literature but also to dig much deeper into the strategies that move populations to act and think. Somewhere in the sea of information you can find every day some instance of data, some fact or observation that has been harvested so early it shapes the development of public awareness long after the anonymity of the passing time renders the source of the idea unknowable. Something will show up, and it will be a few months or so, or longer, and it will show up again, but with more force of one kind or another. And of course the question that it raises is what is happening in the meantime between when ideas first show up and when they become popular at least for a short time and the answer is that it is changing the narrative in someone’s brain about how they perceive themselves ...

Ian Hoopingarner

Search This Blog