Why is effectiveness moral?

There are moments where questions of morality depend on questions of effectiveness. There are situations where effectiveness tempers honesty. And there are certain moments where the entire question of morality in that instance, and for those facts, constitutes the question of whether certain people are effective in that moment.

Comments

We wanted to you see this -- my copy of the Standard

To: Supreme Court, USA Care of: Sonia Sotomayor, A.J. Attn: Elena Kagan, A.J., Ketanji Brown Jackson, A.J. LIMITED. From: .|Î|. TrīangłeLāw. .|Î|. |. • :::THE STANDARD:: — all the time; everything; everywhere.. Î. ;::::::::*::::::================; ,;::*::::*::::*:===============; the ;:::::*::::*::::===============; ;=======================; Standard: ;========the Standard..=====; ;=======================; å ;======================; newšmagåźîné ı of commentary and analysis ı ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...

beyond necessary

In the future, we must cleave to a principle of liberation and follow the right of self-determination wherever it might lead. The old saw of “every thing in its right place” has been shown to turn on subjective and not upon truthful measures - whose idea of what is the “right place” prevails, and for whom is it the “right place”? Are questions that after long experience always revealed strength and power, not reason nor rational government, have been behind the propagation of such a saying. The “right place of everything” comes from an ancient time when the mechanism for discovering the truth was still mistaken for the truth itself. It is assuredly not the case that if every “thing” has a “right place” it isn’t constituted in some transparent organizational scheme; and, although the evolution of knowledge may not be at its bitter end, it seems more likely that the proper “place” for every thing will fill space like the thousand points of light in the night sky of the visible univ...

Geoengineering rests on shaky foundations and poor social planning.

Geoengineering rests on shaky foundations and poor social planning. I think there’s evidence of the government trying to obfuscate information by changing the names of programs and initiatives, to try to render information exposed to the public in previous reporting facially out of date. First off, this is reminding me of Naomi Klein’s chapter on geoengineering, which is very skeptical of the whole idea, as we should all be. Some highlights from that chapter: Alan Robock wrote a paper published in 2008 in Geophysical Research that geoengineering would “disrupt the Asian and African Monsoon and Pacific Monsoons, reducing precipitation to the food supply for billions of people.” Computer models show that geoengineering would crash crop productivity in the Sahel, leading to desertification. Further computer models show a 20% reduction in rainfall in the Amazon from geoengineering. Historical evidence connects volcano eruptions with droughts, meaning we would be risk...

Ian Hoopingarner

Search This Blog